From: Victor Martinez

Date: 01/13/06 16:35:47

 

WOW! Come October, Baby Will Make 300 Million or So of Us in America!

     

 

www.nytimes.com/

 

 

WOW! / "MOVE OVER AND MAKE SOME ROOM FOR ME!" / COME OCTOBER, ONE

NEWBORN BABY WILL MAKE 300,000,000 OF US! / U.S. POPULATION IS GROWING

AT RATE OF 1 PERSON/14 SECONDS WITH A NEW ILLEGAL ALIEN ADDED TO THE

POPULATION EVERY 31 SECONDS! –    By Sam Roberts, N Y Times Staff

Writer, Friday, January 13, 2006 / Front Page Splash, all editions

 

 

If the experts are right, some time this month, perhaps somewhere in the

suburban South or West, a couple, most likely white Anglo-Saxon

Protestants or Hispanic, will conceive a baby who, when born in October,

will become the 300 millionth American.

 

As of yesterday, the Census Bureau officially pegged the resident

population of the United States at closing in on 297,900,000. The bureau

estimates that with a baby being born every 8 seconds, someone dying

every 12 seconds and the nation GAINING AN IMMIGRANT every 31 seconds on

average, the population is GROWING BY ONE PERSON EVERY 14 seconds.

 

At that rate, the total is expected to top 300 million late this year.

But with those projections adjusted monthly and the number of births

typically peaking during the summer, the benchmark is likely to be

reached about nine months from now.

 

"You end up with a number in October," said Katrina Wengert, a

demographer and a keeper of the Census Bureau's official Population

Clock, getting about as specific as possible this far in advance in a

field subject to chronic fudging and revising. The clock is, itself, a

contrivance, of course, but no more so than other pretexts for a

wintertime sexual encounter.

 

Rest assured that hospital publicists, canny obstetricians,

entrepreneurial chambers of commerce, baby food manufacturers, public

officials and countless others pursuing some political social or

personal agenda, abetted by the media, are already guesstimating the

growth rate to anoint any number of unsuspecting newborns as the

mythical American who pushed the nation's population to 300 million.

 

In 1967, when the population reached 200 million, Life magazine

dispatched 23 photographers to locate the baby and devoted a five-page

spread to its search. Instead of deciding on a statistically valid

symbol of the average American newborn, the magazine chose the one born

at precisely the appointed time.

 

Life immortalized Robert Ken Woo Jr. of Atlanta, whose parents, a

computer programmer and a chemical engineer, had immigrated seven years

earlier from China. Mr. Woo graduated magna cum laude from Harvard and

is a litigator. Now 38, he still lives in Atlanta with his wife, Angie,

who is also a lawyer, and their three daughters.

 

"He did feel an obligation to do well," Ms. Woo said. "But I think he

would have done well, regardless."

 

This time, like last, the selection is subject to all manner of

qualifications, not the least of which is the conceit that the census

can measure individuals so precisely as to determine the exact time that

the population tops 300 million or, playing the odds, can define the

average American newborn.

 

Still, demographers do know that the United States, which ranks third in

population behind China and India, is still gaining people while many

other industrialized nations are not. (Japan, officials there announced

last month, has begun shrinking.)

 

Driven by immigration and higher fertility rates, particularly among

newcomers from abroad, the United States' population is growing by just

under 1 percent annually, the EQUIVALENT OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF

CHICAGO (2.8 million).

 

Given the demographic changes recorded in the 20th century, the 300

millionth American, born in the same year the first baby boomers turn

60, will be a very different person from the paradigm in 1915, when the

nation's estimated population passed 100 million, or even in 1967, when

it topped 200 million.

 

The symbolic 300 millionth COULD BE AN IMMIGRANT, arriving by plane or

CROSSING THE BORDER ILLEGALLY,  but most bets by those who study such

things are on a native-born baby. About 11,000 are born each day.

 

"The 300 millionth WILL BE A MEXICAN LATINO IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY,  with

parents who speak Spanish at home and with siblings who are bilingual,"

said William Frey, a demographer with the University of Michigan

Population Studies Center.

 

"This is a far cry from the 200 millionth person who was born in the

late 60's -- probably a white son to middle-class suburbanites in Los

Angeles or New York City," said Dr. Frey, rejecting Life magazine's

determination, "and different from the 100 millionth person born in the

late 1910's, perhaps to a white ethnic city family in New York City or

rural family in upstate New York or Pennsylvania.

 

"The new baby is symbolic of America's new multi-ethnic demography of

the 21st century, both urban and suburban, that will filter out from

gateway cities like L.A., Dallas and New York, as white suburban boomers

fade into the past," he said.

 

Carl Haub, a senior demographer for the Population Reference Bureau, a

research group, concurred that the 300 millionth American is likely to

be male -- more boys are born than girls -- and generally agreed with

Dr. Frey about the baby's other characteristics, but left more wiggle

room.

 

While most Americans are still Anglo-Saxon Protestants, Mr. Haub said,

Hispanic mothers have higher birth rates, and no state has more births

than California, where most newborns are of Hispanic origin. There, Jose

ranked fourth in 2004 among the most popular baby names for boys after

Daniel, Anthony and Andrew. What is more certain is that the 300

millionth American will live longer -- to 85 or 90 on average -- and in

a nation that will be more crowded.

 

Today, there are still plenty of wide-open spaces, with about 80 people

per square mile in the nation. But density varies widely: some Texas

counties are home to fewer than one person per square mile; Manhattan

houses 67,000 per square mile.

 

"By the time the 300 millionth individual gets to adulthood, many of the

cities today we consider small and nice to live in won't be so nice,"

Mr. Haub said.

 

The nation is also becoming more diverse and has been doing so much

faster since the 1970 census than in the 50 years after the 1920 one

registered the 100 millionth American.

 

"The baby who's born this year, as they grow up, they may not know what

we mean by diversity," Mr. Haub said. "And somewhere along mid-century

the word majority will disappear."

 

In 1915, experts differed about whether the 100 millionth was born in

January or in April, but the 1920 census confirmed that the benchmark

had been reached. In 1967, the Census Bureau acknowledged that, because

of undercounting, the 200 millionth American had probably arrived two

years earlier. Also, the official population clock was slowed slightly

on the morning of Nov. 20, 1967, to accommodate President Lyndon B.

Johnson's arrival at the Commerce Department for the ceremony.

 

That same year, David E. Lilienthal, the former chairman of the Atomic

Energy Commission, warned in The New York Times that unbridled

population growth might doom the nation to shortages of water and

energy, bury it in pollution and saddle it with unmanageable poverty. "A

population of at least 300 million by 2000 will, I now believe, threaten

the very quality of life of individual Americans," he wrote.

 

Projections are subject to unimaginable imponderables -- from the impact

of wars and epidemics to dramatic gains in life expectancy. It has taken

230 years for the United States to reach 300 million people (the total

number of people who have ever lived in America is obviously much

higher).

 

The Census Bureau projects that even with the nation growing more slowly

than ever beginning in 2030, the population will top 400 million less

than 40 years from now.

------------------------------------------

© Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company / Click below for "Printer

Friendly Version."

 

 

 

____________________________________________________________

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/13/national/13baby.html?ei=5094&en=965005cbf6337137&hp=&ex=1137214800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print