|
DARK
MATTERS

Part 1
By
Carole Smith
(footnote numbers refer to Endnotes)
Carole Smith
is a psychoanalytical psychotherapist living in London. She is the
author of another paper on the subject of technology which accesses
the mind: “On the Need for New Criteria for Diagnosis of Psychosis
in the Light of Mind-Invasive Technology” published by the Journal
of Psycho-Social Studies in 2003.
At first glance the Klystron[1]
looks like a monstrous industrial carpet shampooer, designed in the
clumsy style of a 1950’s British post box. Originally invented at
Stanford University in 1937, it was used by the British to serve as
an oscillator in radar receivers during WWII to warn of
approaching enemy planes. It has undergone various transformations,
not least of all in its mode as an oscillator, in the two-cavity
model, for security departments to practise transmitting voices into
people’s heads while trapping them in an electromagnetic prison.
Presumably the post-war intention was to drive the target mad,
rather than merely to communicate. Highly versatile, it has even
more important uses as
an amplifier[2],
and it enables through the process of enforced ionisation, the
capacity to actually break the electron out of a human cell or atom,
and transfer that electron to be biologically absorbed into a
compound for the designated use of another human. The effect of this
is for the strengthening of the recipient and the inverse weakening
of the non-consenting donor. This is being inflicted on vulnerable,
unwitting subjects, and is the means, when adapted to wide scale
use, to create a master-slave society, using the trapped donors as a
human fuel supply.
Klystrons are available for private sale,
and you can find them now – new and second-hand on e-bay. Despite
all the sustained efforts and speculations of its victims over the
decades to understand the weird means of their entrapment, there it
was all along: this ugly red machine with inputs and outputs, feeds
into and emitters out of the chamber, with its knobs and spouts and
pressure controls. Primitive versions can even be assembled by
amateur electronics enthusiasts. They don’t need to be sell them
under the counter or off the back of an industrial haulage vehicle,
for although their special applications have been kept secret by
governments for decades, both for home and abroad, all they are is…
well, they’re simply a ‘travelling wave tube’.
This month there are about eight of them
for sale on e-bay.
It’s difficult to know how long they’ve
been used for voice messaging – we need a leak or a noble
disclosure, to understand either when, or by whom, the various
augmentations for its usage should be accredited. We do know from
the oral history of activist records that there are people who can
date the onset of their persecution with voice messaging forty years
ago,[3]
and there are plenty who attest to their harassment for over twenty
years. from the early 1980’s, about the time that the Greenham women
were reporting the effects of microwave targeting, while protesting
against the US nuclear warheads, under Mrs Thatcher’s government.
We certainly do know that when thousands
of civilians world wide have reported the physical, emotional and
verbal assaults made on them, no government official has ever
responded with either acknowledgement of the technical capacity in
their possession to do these things to people, nor made any effort
to help them. One would have thought that they would at least
express some curiosity about the reports, if only to give a
convincing performance as responsible representatives of the people.
It seems likely that they fear the scorn of their peers,[4]
and that there is some form of group consensus on the matter.
Surely one of the most
contemptible examples of hypocritical double standards, as well as
one of the most shocking betrayals of trust in modern times on the
part of governments, this private joke between international
statesmen has persisted for decades. When a person commits a murder
and is sentenced to prison, he is under law given the opportunity to
redeem himself by learning skills, or improving his education. He
may be offered psychotherapy and take part in groups where prisoners
attempt to help each other. His sentence may be shortened for good
behaviour – at least under present laws.[5]
The terrible truth is that there is, as far as it has been possible
to ascertain, a cold-blooded decision made about an innocent human
being, even a child or a young person, or a mother of young
children, to be consigned to permanent and irreversible captivity
for experimental torture when the radar picks up them out for
targeting. This is game-hunting for the privileged, and also for
those connected to power. It surely discredits any government who
uses and secretly endorses it, and reduces their mouthings on human
rights to so much nonsense. In this context, one is mindful of the
time and energy taken up in the debate about the rights of
fox-hunting, all the while that civilians are being derided for
their protests about this government-sponsored and disavowed
practice of trapping and torturing innocent human civilians. While
the foxhunting issue divided the nation, there has been no
acknowledgement whatsoever to people’s claims to being hunted and
trapped like animals, other than mocking derision. What does this
say about Great Britain?
Mr Blair’s government,
dedicated to protecting the health of the nation, has decreed that
smoking is now to be banned in public places, and perhaps soon it
will be illegal to smoke at home. Public outrage against animal
experimentation is countered by equally vehement arguments in its
defence. Laboratories of chimpanzees - some having been found with
the tops of their heads sawn off, it is reported - have been closed
down. The researchers have said they are looking for other methods
of experimentation. Outrage against animal experimentation provides
a very useful displacement for the unthinkable: that there might be
some truth in humans also being used as experimental animals.[6]
Recently we have
seen the Stock Exchange react to pressure against Life Sciences
Laboratories’ animal experiments. This all aids the myth of ‘ethical
business.’ In truth, the need for animal experiments has greatly
diminished. Anyone who reads New Scientist will know that using
thought to move an arm has been demonstrated, in 2003, by a
paralysed patient (and a chimpanzee) learning
how to modify
their brain waves by monitoring waveform data from sensors placed on
their scalps.[7]
This demonstration of the visible means of engineering is seized
upon as proof of direct manipulation, and you will find the
term ‘transcranial magnetic stimulation’ freely referred to by the
most conservative commentators on neuroscientific advances. This is
the acceptable face of experimentation with that thing called
‘magnetism’, and the image of a person sitting comfortably with an
array of wires arranged over the scalp is about as far as it goes in
the demonstrable history of the
extraction of
the information from the brain. Nothing sophisticated, and nothing
remotely remote.
One can see a
parallel in the means of demonstrating the control of criminals
outside prison with tag and track methods,[8]
for how can those with the technology possibly admit that they have
the means to control people remotely, indirectly - or
non-consensually - in a democracy?
No one in public life has apparently ever
been able to form the thought that humans could be used as
experimentees. They would still need “a much more convincing
argument,” to believe that it was technically possible to manipulate
human beings remotely, they say, as they go back to working on their
digital television systems, and wireless internet. It is most likely
that all those shrewd journalists, the law, and the human rights
groups, not least of all the members of parliament who represent us,
will only believe such a thing possible when an establishment figure
is wheeled on, cast and dressed for the part and makes a testimony
of a miraculous event, before accepting that which they have
consistently rejected as delusional. It must be a modern fairy story
to carry credibility, and the part coached, if not mimed.[9]
When the miraculous has occurred, we will
all then feel better about being able to see through another
person’s eyes –forget the metaphor, this will be for real[10].
“The success of an investigation "to make the invisible visible"
depends, among other things, on how light of the correct wavelength
and a sufficient number of photons (intensity) can be focussed on to
a specimen, for example. Synchrotron radiation enables this kind of
"seeing", because it consists of very intense radiation of variable
energy. In particular, man-made synchrotron radiation spans the
important region of the electromagnetic spectrum from infrared (IR)
to X-ray radiation. Synchrotron radiation occurs when charged
particles, such as electrons, travel close to the speed of light and
are deflected by a magnet. As a result of the radial acceleration in
the magnetic field (Lorentz force) the particles emit
electromagnetic radiation.”[11]
We won’t need imaginative empathy or appreciation of difference. We
can get fused! We’ll be able to communicate with each other
without a telephone!
There is so much ‘sophisticated’
technology now that the military sector, having secured that which
is essential for protecting our security, can feel, along with the
government and the researchers, a little more relaxed about
releasing some of the fun aspects for the public’s enjoyment, and
the commercial sector is fairly bursting with ideas for ingenious
spin-offs. The first conscious robot will be considered cute. It
will be the result of literally years – decades of extracting
information about how the nervous system is wired – from people who
have been trapped in agony, and whose crippled lives have enabled
researchers to make their profits. Since the creation of a conscious
robot is a mechanical process ensuing from the control of the brain
and the nervous system, there is already and will be lots more
localised targeting of joints to resolve the articulation of kinetic
problems - teams of biomedical engineers beavering away from Beijing
to Tokyo to San Diego to Oxford, Cambridge and London – to bring
automation to life. That aching hip joint may not be osteo-arthritis
after all but the necessary research to articulate a robot – or even
to find a cure for osteoporosis. Or both.
Peek-a-boo cameras to see what you’re
seeing, fusion devices to think what you’re thinking, for example,
Snoopy-style surveillance for little brother. You can be fairly
sure that soon you’ll be able to get in touch with your loved one,
or whoever, via Microsoft’s patent 6,754,472 and throb together,
body and skin being used as a computer network.[12]
Perhaps TSM (transcranial magnetic stimulation) will make us all a
little brighter and happier,[13]
hopefully without having to wear a prosthesis under a hairpiece,[14]
as with the hippocampus replacement. Or will there be a truly
socialist pooling of God-given talents by transmitting energy
through the airwaves – to each according to his needs. Perhaps
this really will be Mr Brown’s new Jerusalem,[15]
and his vision of ‘the golden thread that runs through British
history since Magna Carta’ – will be the pooling and sharing of
electromagnetic energy, the support of the disadvantaged by the
clever and the rich, rather than the grabbing of power and the
securing of it by establishing negative feedback loops to ensure
that there is a one way benefit - to make the rich richer by taking
by stealth the energy from the poor.[16]
There will surely be no end to the
goodness which will ensue from the intervention of divine
providence in the form of the miracle of the fusion of two human
souls, minds and bodies. A small price for the human laboratory rats
to pay to bring the world such wonder. And at last, those refusés,
psychiatrically sectioned, invalided, disenfranchised, will be
given their place in the sun – the heroes, the survivors of the war,
the human guinea pigs - up there, sharing the limelight and the
platform with the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall,
Madonna, Bono, or Elton John – to demonstrate to the world that
technological triumphalism must always be tempered by a little
humility, even, perhaps, by a sense of shame at man’s essential
duplicity
If the governments of the United States,
Great Britain, Europe, Australia, to mention the A-team, have been
able to justify their policies of destroying innocent civilians to
give their secret security trainees suitable target practice to keep
their hand in, (and their girlfriends and sons), they must find it a
little stickier to justify the fact that the private sector runs
rampant with the technology, for research, sexual perversion,
developing computer games, biomedical engineering, cancer cures from
handouts, and of course, knowledge about that wonderful organ, the
human brain.
That’s what you might think – until you
realise that allowing the technology to proliferate as torture
delivered by the private sector, sorry, in research, would be
exactly the way they might choose to distance themselves from
exclusive, original sin, at the same time feeding the hunger for new
gadgetry and stupefying the population. Opportunism and organised
crime contribute enormously to the national turnover.
Without a word from a single member of
parliament all over the world - with the notable exception of M.
Claude Goasguen[17]
in the French Assembly - there hasn’t been a squeak out of any of
them. There can’t be a country left in the world now who hasn’t been
flogged some version of the Klystron by now. Perhaps they sold off
the carpet shampoo version to Mr Mugabe at a good price. Now they
are almost certainly equipping the chaps (and their girl-friends)
with the new nanochip crystal[18]
link cell-phone versions, elegantly packaged, with favourites keyed
in for easy access. It’s no longer necessary to sit for hours locked
up with a carpet shampooer in the garden shed - rather hazardous if
the microwave emission pipe gets clogged up and needs servicing.
But, my goodness, what teamwork!
One has to hand it to them – the stiff
upper lip has really won through. And the press, the law, and the
medical profession – they too have all rallied and shown us that the
security of the country is uppermost. All those philosophical
treatises on regretful utilitarianism have found their mark. One
would have wished that it hadn’t been necessary, but…defence of the
realm…a few losses…there are something things we just have to do.
We’ll grin while you bear it. As we have recently witnessed in the
splendid celebrations of the sixtieth anniversary of the end of
World War II, we British (if I may be so bold as to use the plural
pronoun) really know how to show the world what we’re made of when
we’re under attack.
Some things just have to be done. So,
bathed in microwaves, stoked by particles, manipulated by twitching
fingers tuning and retuning frequency knobs, locked into position by
enormous force fields, tracked anywhere in the globe, fed a steady
stream of abusive or sexual obscenities, deprived of intimacy,
turned up, turned down, on, off, backwards, sideways, jerked around,
jerked off, ionised, atomised, ostracised - the work goes on.
“They’re a great bunch of chaps,” as Mr Blair recently said a little
huskily at a press conference, and we must do what we can to protect
them in their difficult work.
The Home Office in Great Britain advises
people who turn to them for help that what they are experiencing are
“beliefs that have no basis in reality,” and that: “Our advice to
these correspondents is that they consider talking with a medical
professional. All the feedback (author’s emphasis) we receive
from individuals who decide to follow this advice indicates that
they find discussing their concerns with a doctor very beneficial.”
(Letters to author, March 2005).
It is clear that the medical profession,
and the press, mostly funded by the government, relies on that
government to give them a straight answer. “Is there any truth in
this rumour that you are keeping people locked up like animals in
cages and using them for target practice?” “Not a word of truth in
it!” comes the reply sharply back.[19]
How could conscientious doctors allow
themselves to believe that a government in a democracy could have
known for sixty years that it was possible to transmit voices, and
entrap people; that they practised this system on citizens while
simultaneously encouraging the doctors to refer complainants of such
resulting symptoms for treatment for delusional psychosis? The
consequences from this constant bath of particle injected microwaves
and enforced ionising cell depletion – including leukaemia –are very
serious. If a patient mentions voice transmission - some victims are
used for experiments which don’t include voice messaging – he knows
only too well where that will lead him. If he reports the physical
symptoms such as severe this eye problems and degradation of
vision, sinus, problems, dehydration, severe headaches, dizziness,
extreme fatigue and breathlessness, erratic changes in blood
pressure, symptoms of, or actual, heart attacks, lung and nasal
congestion, nausea, electrical jolts and spasms in any part of the
body, bowel problems, urinary infections, skin problems,
sleeplessness - there will be no improvement from any of the
prescribed remedies, as the source of them continues unabated. The
doctor will consign the patient to that dreaded category – the
habitual neurotic. The kindest advice the victim will receive is to
take a holiday, tranquillisers or preferably both. There are no
holidays for these people whose location has been fixed by an
operator, who saw fit to consign their lives to resonate inexorably
to a metal gyrating satellite dish.
It is clearly difficult for a busy doctor,
in his/her best efforts for the patient, to make a reliable
diagnosis about a patient’s sanity if the patient is reporting
symptoms which result from technological experiments, the nature of
which he/she is completely uninformed. A general practitioner – and
even a specialist in neurological disorders - - simply has no
information on which to base a diagnosis about microwave and
particle assault, not to mention the transmission of voices. The
Prime Minister recently answered a question in the House of Commons
concerning the effect of cell phones and microwaves on health, in
which he evaded any direct answer, saying he was ‘guided by the
experts’. It is not surprising therefore that a doctor will refer
the patient to a psychiatrist, since the only certainty for him is
that ‘hearing voices indicates schizophrenia’. The symptoms are
listed quite clearly in the DSM Psychiatric Handbook. There it is.
Let’s check it over one more time:
The Third Edition (1987)
of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM) required that there be at least four of the characteristics
set out for a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and an approved selection
of four could be: magical thinking, telepathy or sixth sense;
limited social contact; odd speech; and over-sensitivity to
criticism. By 1994, the required number of qualifying
characteristics were reduced to two or more, including, say,
hallucinations and ‘negative ‘ symptoms such as affective
flattening, or disorganised or incoherent speech – or only one if
the delusions were bizarre or the hallucination consisted of a voice
keeping up a running commentary on the person’s behaviour or
thoughts. The next edition of the DSM is not due until the year
2010.
It has happened to thousands, and it is
difficult to forgive either the government or the crassness of
psychiatric misdiagnosis.
It is easier to take up the causes of
human rights abuse in far off countries, than to inspect the dark
instances of it on your own doorstep. It is hard to believe that
psychiatrists from time to time must not have had their doubts that
the person was rendering an account of actual persecution. The
writer’s extensive communications with people who have reported the
details of voice messaging evidence a distinctly different character
to the experiences of delusional psychosis in the form in which the
person has become adrift from reality, and feels driven by powerful
unconscious forces to act without insight. They are for the most
part, mocking, degrading, or falsely seductive remarks, carrying
varying degrees of manipulative skill. The fact that they are there
at all, and commenting on the inner workings of a person’s mind is
enough to drive the sanest person crazy. An act of violence
committed as a result of being under these intolerable pressures,
and being unable, despite correct behaviour, to make any one
understand or believe the communicated experience, but to wearily
smile and label them psychotic, is an act of violence in itself -
or so it must so often see to the person who has tried once more, to
put himself in trust to a doctor.
Is it so difficult to believe that voices
could be transmitted directly into a person’s hearing when we have
not only put a man on the moon, but spoken to him there? And how
have the researchers in aeronautics and space travel tested their
physics? Did they send up teams of valiant astronauts into space to
the applause of the world without testing the forces of gravity, the
magnetohydrodynamics, the turbulence, the states of compression, the
extreme states of stress – so horrific that it makes people teeth
crack, and lose consciousness from shock and electrolyte cell
depletion? No, there is no applause in the credits of the
astronautical programmes for those people who were treated like so
many cogs and valves and pumps, to test whether the scientists had
got their maths right. Physics, and astrophysics is perpetually in
search of a model, and when they found they could test just about
everything they needed to know for plasma physics on human beings,
they kept the model for astrophysics.
Any sustained attempt to
understand how people could be trapped within their own bodies,
eventually leads one to the study of the entrapment of plasma in
nuclear processes, and to the realisation that the history of human
control must be intertwined with that of plasma physics.
[20]
And surprisingly enough, the red carpet
shampooer, as well has stood the test of time, but now, of course,
in nanotech pocket size, and its uses are constantly expanding.
The encoding of the mind, and access to
stored memory and experiences in the hippocampus,[21]
[22] has now also enabled
the remote access and influencing of a person’s life history. This
makes possible a form of manipulation that requires no intuition, no
empathy, no permission for confidentiality, no skill, no respect,
simply a device originating from the combined technologies which
have been developed without either regulation or disclosure. It is
unrealistic in the extreme to deny that brain mapping, and access to
the interior life of a person, would not result in a device which
would be restricted to those with the power and money to use it for
their secret purposes. The implications of the withholding of such
potential for control, and for the creation of a master-slave
society, makes the sin of omission a first-degree crime. The
governments who have facilitated and funded this research, must in
all justice, be accused of the destruction of democracy, and the
practice of terrorism. It should be kept in mind that the
British government has made it clear in July, 2005 that the
withholding of information about suspected terrorists is a
prisonable offence.
THE KLYSTRON
The Klystron, invented at Stanford in
1937, derives its name, as we are told in Stanford’s background
information,[23]
“with the assistance
of the Stanford Classics Department after
the Greek verb "klyzo," which describes the action of waves breaking
on a shore. (The inventors, the Varian brothers, could not possibly
have known how closely the simulated klystron electron beam
resembles breaking waves, as we now do using modern computers.)”
(Nor “The breaking of bodies and minds”, a study of psychiatric
abuse, torture and the ethics of medecine, by Eric Stover and Elena
Nightingale, written in 1985, and published by no less than the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, and which
includes extensive cases of abuse in the Soviet Union and Latin
America, but not North America.)
“Klystrons are high-vacuum devices based
on the interaction of a well-focused pencil electron beam with a
number of microwave cavities that it traverses, which are tuned at
or near the operating frequency of the tube. The principle is
conversion of the kinetic energy in the beam, imparted by a high
accelerating voltage, to microwave energy. Conversion takes place as
a result of the amplified RF input signal, causing the beam to form
“bunches”. These give up their energy to the high level induced RF
fields at the output cavity. The amplified signal is extracted
(author’s italics) from the output cavity through a vacuum
window. Klystrons have high gain, and can be very high-power
devices, provided that:….”
There’s nothing there to immediately
arouse the suspicions that there might be other uses to which it
would be put, especially with this pleasant association from nature
of the breaking of waves on the beach. The essential feature of the
Klystron’s application to humans is the breaking of the natural
waves, or frequencies of the body. This is the method of control.
The body is a natural oscillator, constantly tuning in to its own
needs, to the forces of nature, to other people’s wave lengths, to
the natural environment, to the forces of nature. It is, at its
most sensitive, a superb resonating instrument. It was not designed
for external interference but to adapt to its most highly tuned
responses.
Perverted or power-mad people, messing
about with AC and DC frequencies in a resonating chamber, slowing
them down, increasing them by operating a knob or dial, mixing them
together, and feeding them back through the electron beam into the
system of a human being, or even an animal, depriving them of all
natural responses!
What an appalling corruption!
If Prince Charles is sincere in his wish
to support the health of his subjects through “more humane living
environments”,[24]
and the encouragement of alternative medicine, then he would be
better advised[25]
to go, without further delay, to the real cause of the problem and
open a debate about the ruination of health and natural
self-regulation by the interference with the body’s frequencies by
those whose covert goal is to impose control of the air-waves for
the purposes of political and social manipulation.
Beginning with a basic
description from the Electrical Engineering Training Series:
Microwave Tubes
Microwave tubes perform the same functions
of generation and amplification in the microwave portion of the
frequency spectrum that vacuum tubes perform at lower
frequencies…the most widely used microwave tubes, include klystrons,
travelling-wave tubes, backward-wave oscillators, magnetrons, and
crossed-field amplifiers. The variations of these tubes for use in
specific applications are so numerous that all of them cannot be
discussed in this module. However, general principles of operation
are similar in all of the variations so the explanations will be
restricted to the general principles of operation.
The Klystron: See Diagram and description:
Basic Two-Cavity - Electrical Engineering Training Series[26](10)
Klystrons are
velocity-modulated tubes that are used in radar and communications
equipment as oscillators and amplifiers. Klystrons make use of the
transit-time effect by varying the velocity of an electron beam in
much the same manner as the previously discussed velocity-modulation
process. Strong electrostatic fields are necessary in the klystron
for efficient operation. This is necessary because the interaction
of the signal and the electron beam takes place in a very short
distance.
The construction and
essential components of a TWO-CAVITY KLYSTRON are shown in view (A)
of figure 2-7. View (B) is a schematic representation of the same
tube. When the tube is energized, the cathode emits electrons which
are focused into a beam by a low positive voltage on the control
grid. The beam is then accelerated by a very high positive dc
potential that is applied in equal amplitude to both the accelerator
grid and the buncher grids. The buncher grids are connected to a
cavity resonator that superimposes an ac potential on the dc
voltage. Ac potentials are produced by oscillations within the
cavity that begin spontaneously when the tube is energized. The
initial oscillations are caused by random fields and circuit
imbalances that are present when the circuit is energized. The
oscillations within the cavity produce an oscillating electrostatic
field between the buncher grids that is at the same frequency as the
natural frequency of the cavity. The direction of the field changes
with the frequency of the cavity. These changes alternately
accelerate and decelerate the electrons of the beam passing through
the grids. The area beyond the buncher grids is called the DRIFT
SPACE. The electrons form bunches in this area when the accelerated
electrons overtake the decelerated electrons.
The function of the
CATCHER GRIDS is to absorb energy from the electron beam. The
catcher grids are placed along the beam at a point where the bunches
are fully formed. The location is determined by the transit time of
the bunches at the natural resonant frequency of the cavities (the
resonant frequency of the catcher cavity is the same as the buncher
cavity). The location is chosen because maximum energy transfer to
the output (catcher) cavity occurs when the electrostatic field is
of the correct polarity to slow down the electron bunches.
The two-cavity klystron in
figure 2-7 may be used either as an oscillator or an amplifier. The
configuration shown in the figure is correct for oscillator
operation. The feedback path provides energy of the proper delay and
phase relationship to sustain oscillations.
A signal applied at the buncher grids will be
amplified if the feedback path is removed.
THE ENTRAPMENT OF PEOPLE
In its two-cavity form the Klystron is
also used, although the information is presumably not supplied
anywhere in the hand-book specifications,[27]
for the trapping of people, in a compression state of Inertial
Electrostatic Confinement, which produces a very wide variety of
symptoms and illnesses, and deprives the person of their natural
voluntary state. They are as if trapped in a pressure cooker.
With respect to body functions, the
double cavity Klystron can be used for acting out all types of
sexual perversion as the operator can experiment to find the
frequency of any human orifice. Children, also, are particular risk
to such sexual abuse. This will perhaps eventually be cited as a
reason why a conscientious government has been reluctant to openly
discuss the versatility of the Klystron. This will not carry
conviction for those parents who, to the writer’s knowledge, have
repeatedly pleaded with the police to help them investigate the
electronic harassment of distress of their children. There are also
multi-cavity Klystrons for the more ambitious amateur. It should
nevertheless be said that as a form of sexual abuse, this practice
effectively destroys the private and sexual life of the trapped
person. Many people have preferred to end their lives than to live
as a captive, being held permanently by a sexual predator.
There are, apparently, people who do
private training courses for the various uses of this device. No
doubt it is an important tool for secret societies of one kind or
another. It is without doubt that political leaders have also known
this aspect of its usage for many decades.
Methods for detection have become vastly
more precise in recent years, although it is appropriate here to
mention microwave distance meters as an adjunct to the capabilities
of the oscillating detection of frequency of the Klystron. The means
of keeping a person entrapped in his/her own space, in the
two-chamber model, is achieved in this way: The reference signal
denoting the frequency of the person picked up in the receiver, by
the radar, enters the resonant cavity. An electron beam from the
cathode of an electron gun is injected into the frequency wave.
Electrons then are transmitted back through the travelling beam to
the person emitting the signal. Electron-charged particles then
enter the body of the person through an aperture located by their
signal. The charged particles in the person now spiral inside the
body plasma, creating a helical trajectory[28]
around a magnetic field line. Once this magnetic field is
established, the body’s particles can be kept charged by the
emission of electrons or left dormant in the state of microwave
inertial electrostatic confinement.
The beam or wave which is sent back to the
receiver is held together by the parallel magnetic field established
in the chamber of the Klystron. It is attracted through a connecting
passage – the Drift Tube – to a second resonant chamber containing a
positively charged anode. While passing through the
connecting chamber the velocity of the electron beam is modulated or
bunched at selected points along the Catcher. The function
of the Catcher Grids is to absorb energy from the electron beam. The
catcher grids are placed along the beam at a point where the bunches
are fully formed. The location is determined by the transit time of
the bunches at the natural resonant frequency of the cavities (the
resonant frequency of the catcher cavity is the same as the buncher
cavity). The location is chosen because maximum energy transfer to
the output (catcher) cavity occurs when the electrostatic field is
of the correct polarity to slow down the electron bunches.
SENDING MESSAGES
If the purpose of the travelling wave was
initially as a communications system, it was then apparently adapted
to a means of bombarding an enemy with messages. The Klystron acts
as a transmitter and a receiver, with an input for sound, and an
output for messaging.
Between the input or buncher grids and the
catcher grids there is, when the device is used as an oscillator, a
feedback path. This enables an input signal for transmission
and reception by coupling back to the input by means of a short,
internal loop.
This creates a closed system for the
person whose frequency has been caught and who has been placed in an
electrostatic prison. He/she has no choice other than to hear the
voices, or sounds that are emitted, the source of which might be a
tape, or real time.
When, as we have seen, the electron beam
or sound wave is focused by a low positive voltage on the control
grid, it is then accelerated by a very high positive dc (direct
current) potential applied in equal amplitude to both the
accelerator grid and the buncher grids. The buncher grids are
connected to a cavity resonator that superimposes an ac
(alternating current) potential on the dc voltage. Ac
potentials are produced by oscillations within the cavity that begin
spontaneously when the tube is energised.
It is necessary to imagine that this
mixing of currents in the chamber is being experienced in the system
of the person who is now in a parallel state in terms of his/her
resonating frequency.
“The initial oscillations are caused by
random fields and circuit imbalances that are present when the
circuit is energized.”
This of course means that the person
who is being exposed to the oscillating and random fields is being
thrown into a weirdly unpleasant state of absolute confusion. The
feeling in the body could be exactly paralleled – as indeed it is in
frequency terms – to someone who has his/her hand on the tuning knob
of a radio valve and is turning it up and down with no seemingly
sane intention, and altering the volume on impulse. This treatment
is designed to drive an ensnared person to acts of enraged
desperation or violence. There are few problems in creating
assassins out of such people driven beyond the limits of endurance.
There is also ample opportunity for the seduction through the
application of frequencies which stimulate the required states, and
inversely, through such extreme forms of particle injected sexual
stimulation through genital or rectal access, that the effect of
such rape might well result in the acting out in an effort to
relieve the recipient. The creation of a violent or stupefied
society seems to be well within the powers of those who have the
controlling skills.
The effort of discipline exerted by so
many victims in resisting such a cruelly calculated system of
manipulative torture is wholly unappreciated – except by other
sufferers who attempt to support each other. That so many people
refuse to give in to their tormentors by refraining from committing
anti-social acts goes very far to demonstrate human powers of
endurance and the exercise of free will.
“The oscillations within the cavity
produce an oscillating electrostatic field between the bencher grids
that is at the same frequency as the natural frequency of the
cavity.“ This is the process which seems to so many as if a
magnetic mirror is being held up to reflect an imposed and
other-determined state.
The direction of the field changes with
the frequency of the cavity. These changes alternately accelerate
and decelerate the electrons of the beam passing through the grids.
This is experienced by the parallel
person, as one might imagine, as the sudden shock and jolting
forward, alternating with the diminishing of function or kinetic
energy. For more sophisticated operators with knowledge in recent
techniques, owing much to the discoveries of neuroscience, it can be
– if there is access to mri scanning equipment – the calculated
experimentation with impulse or arousal of intent, and the effective
inhibition of action.
Much of what is known about brain
function would owe its
knowledge to the experimental and
observational skills based and facilitated by this basic control
model.
“The area beyond the buncher grids is
called the DRIFT SPACE. The electrons form bunches in this area when
the accelerated electrons overtake the decelerated electrons.”
This is the outcome of the take-over –
the operator has made off with the ion stripped from the electron.
Now positively charged, it is polarised within the ionisation space,
which is a magnetic field, leaving behind the electron, or cation,
which has lost one or more of its electrons. After amplification
and merging with the anion in the second chamber, the new fortified
or bunched electron can now be extracted with a probe - as a gas, or
matter.
This potential energy can then be
transported by Fourier transform or time-of-flight for processing by
mass spectrometry, and redistribution.
When more was understood about other
potentials in having a human neurobiology in captivity, the
chemistry involved in the creation of energy through particle
injection became better understood.
This process is the ionisation of cells.
IONISATION: LOSSES AND GAINS
When you heat up an atom, an object which
has a neutral charge, it will lose some of its outer electrons which
are negatively charged. The positively charged electron can then be
stripped of its positive electron by short negative laser bursts,
and accelerated away from the cathode through the ionisation space
towards the anode in the process of ionisation. This process is
known as electron impact, or electronic ionisation, which under
normal laboratory conditions, requires the gas sample to be
dissolved in an analyte solution to protect it against
fragmentation, since many thermally labile analytes decompose upon
heating.
The negatively charged atomic ion has now
gained one or more electrons, and is known as an anion. The
positively charged atomic ion, which has lost one or more electrons,
is known as a cation.
Both the electron and the ion can be
moved about by electric and magnetic fields.
Each successive ionisation energy is
markedly greater than the last. The n-th ionisation energy of
an atom is the energy required to strip it of its n-th
electron after the first n-1 have already been removed.
The original electron is now reproducible,
since a positively charged anion has now been formed, from the
previously positive electron, which has been exposed to a negative
charge. The ion is observable as a vapour.
It may help to understand the chemistry of
the ionisation process imposed by the Klystron applied to human
biology, by imagining a positive cathode being forcefully driven by
force fields into a tin plate – the negative anode that is
given a positive charge in order for it to absorb the energy of the
electron.
WELTENSCHAUUNG
OR WORLD VIEW
"Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind
of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically
control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled
by electric stimulation of the brain."
[29]
Under the auspices the
fascist regime in Spain during WWII, Jose Delgado began his research
into the use of pain and pleasure for mind control. Later, as
Director of Neuropsychiatry at Yale University Medical School, he
refined the design of his "transdermal stimulator"...a computer
controlled, remote neurologic transceiver and aversion stimulator.
Since the 1970s, Delgado "has shifted his interest from direct
electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) to the broader area of the
biological effects of electromagnetic fields," wrote
Dr. Robert Becker, the pioneering researcher into electromagnetism
in his book, “Cross Currents”.[30]
“To Delgado, the mind existed only in the brain; to postulate
its existence as an independent entity was sheer nonsense. He
rejected the cherished concept of free will, and he proposed that
the mind was a functional entity produced by the electrical
operations of the brain. As such, it could – and should – be
manipulated by external means.”
To quote Delgado:
“Because the brain controls the whole body and all mental
activities, electrical stimulation of the brain could possibly
become a master control of human behaviour by means of
man-made-plans and instruments…to discuss whether human behaviour
can or should be controlled is naïve and misleading. We should
discuss
what controls are ethical, considering the efficiency and mechanisms
of existing procedures and the desirable degree of these and other
controls in the future.”
“…it is already possible
to equip animals or human beings with minute instruments called
"stimoceivers" for radio transmission and reception of electrical
messages to and from the brain in completely unrestrained subjects.
Microminiaturization of the instrument's electronic components
permits control of all parameters of excitation for radio
stimulation of three different points within the brain and also
telemetric recording of three channels of intracerebral electrical
activity.
It is reasonable to
speculate that in the near future the stimoceiver may provide the
essential link from man to computer to man, with a reciprocal
feedback between neurons and instruments which represents a new
orientation for the medical control of neurophysiological functions.
For example, it is conceivable that the localized abnormal
electrical activity which announces the imminence of an epileptic
attack could be picked up by implanted electrodes, telemetered to a
distant instrument room, tape-recorded, and analyzed by a computer
capable of recognizing abnormal electrical patterns. Identification
of the specific electrical disturbance could trigger the emission of
radio signals to activate the patient's stimoceiver and apply an
electrical stimulation to a determined inhibitory area of the brain,
thus blocking the onset of the convulsive episode.
One of the limiting
factors in these studies was the existence of wires leading from the
brain to the stimoceiver outside of the scalp. The wires represented
a possible portal of entry for infection and could be a hindrance to
hair grooming in spite of their small size. It would obviously be
far more desirable to employ minute instruments which could be
implanted completely beneath the skin. For this purpose we have
developed in our laboratory a small three-channel stimulator which
can be placed subcutaneously and which has terminal leads to be
implanted within the brain (Figure 6). The instrument is solid
state, has no batteries, and can work indefinitely. Necessary
electrical energy, remote control of parameters of stimulation, and
choice of channels are provided by transdermal coupling, using a
small coil which is activated by frequency-modulated radio signals.
The technology for
nonsensory communication between brains and computers through the
intact skin is already at our fingertips, and its consequences are
difficult to predict. In the past the progress of civilization has
tremendously magnified the power of our senses, muscles, and skills.
Now we are adding a new dimension: the direct interface between
brains and machines.
Although true, this statement is perhaps too spectacular and it
requires cautious clarification. Our present knowledge regarding the
coding of information, mechanisms of perception, and neuronal bases
of behavior is so elemental that it is highly improbable that
electrical correlates of thoughts or emotions could be picked up,
transmitted, and electrically applied to the suitable structure of a
different subject in order to be recognized and to trigger related
thoughts or emotions. It is, however, already possible to induce a
large variety of responses, from motor effects to emotional
reactions and intellectual manifestations, by direct electrical
stimulation of the brain. Also, several investigators have learned
to identify patterns of electrical activity (which a computer could
also recognize) localized in specific areas of the brain and related
to determined phenomena such as perception of smells or visual
perception of edges and movements. We are advancing rapidly in the
pattern recognition of electrical correlates of behavior and in the
methodology for two-way radio communication between brain and
computers.
Fears have been expressed that this new technology brings with it
the threat of possible unwanted and unethical remote control of the
cerebral activities of man by other men, but as will be discussed
later, this danger is quite improbable and is outweighed by the
expected clinical and scientific benefits. Electronic knowledge and
microminiaturization have progressed so much that the limits appear
biological rather than technological. Our greatest need is for more
experimental information about the neuronal mechanisms related to
behavioral and mental processes, and research in unrestricted
subjects promises to reveal new understanding of normal minds and
more efficient therapy of disturbed brains.” (cit. Delgado, 1969)
In “Telemetry is Coming of Age”, Dr Stuart Mackay[31]
wrote about the art of monitoring from a distance:
“The purpose of biomedical telemetry is to monitor or study animals
and humans with minimal disturbance to their normal activity and to
explore otherwise inaccessible parts of the body. It covers a
variety of
situations. Animal
subjects range in size from bees to whales, useful
transmission distances
vary from a centimeter to a few thousand kilometres and transmission
times from a few minutes to a few years to the life of the subject;
frequencies range from 40 kHz to a few hundred megahertz; subjects
range from trees to humans and include animals flying, burrowing in
the ground now and swimming in fresh or salt water; transmitters can
be implanted surgically, swallowed, inserted through other
normal body openings, or carried externally; power can be
induced inward for tissue stimulation to energize transmitters and
to produce mechanical motions; transmitters monitor safety of
workers in hazardous situations, carry
signals from sterile regions, mark animals
with darts, and enhance or reduce reproduction data; they have been
used during a variety of situations including sleeping, loving,
working, eating, lecturing, and diving. All this can be done with
biomedical telemetry without the subject's disturbance.”
This remarkable
insensitivity, so arrogant and so unknowing about the conscious life
of creatures, and the even less understood linking of the
instinctual to perception, surely gave a warning, not just about the
evolution of techniques for monitoring living creatures, but also
about the total disregard for sentience in scientific method when it
is split off from ethics. It carries very great significance also
for the extensive methods of surveillance to which we are all now
subjected, with not even a query raised as to the changes it brings
about in our natural responses to our environment.
One might have thought that none of this
had ever happened when listening to the BBC Radio 4 programme “Start
the Week”, a little while after the last of the Reith lectures,
(“The Triumph of Technology”) given this year by Lord Sir Alec
Broers, former Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University, President of
the Royal Academy of Engineering, and Chairman of the House of Lords
Science and Technology Committee, who was in conversation with
another guest on the programme, Dr Kathleen Taylor, a research
scientist in the physiology department of Oxford University, on the
occasion of the publication of her book: “Brainwashing: The Science
of Thought Control.” “Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control”.[32]
There was - Lord Sir Alec prompted his
co-interviewee to affirm that there was “nothing sophisticated” in
her research findings about techniques for brainwashing. Dr Taylor
confirmed that the science of thought control extended mainly to the
widespread influence of advertising campaigns, marketing, and
‘persuasive’ techniques to influence opinion by television and
politics. On reading her book, one finds that she makes the
following concession:
“Most recently, methods of transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been developed which interfere with
neurons on a grand scale (temporarily) by directly
(present author’s italics) applying magnetic fields to the brain.
Attempts have been made at controlling simple animal behaviours,
with some success, and the simplest human behaviours may also be
accessible to this kind of approach, as Penfield showed.
Controlling anything more complex – like individual ideas – has
proved impossible. Human beings are simply too varied and
unpredictable, and present-day micro-electrode and neural implant
technology too imprecise, for us to have conquered – yet – the world
within our skulls.” (p 236 cit).
“Brainwashing” even omits to mention
surely the most celebrated display by Dr Delgado, who even in 1969
was demonstrating to an invited public his technique for stopping a
charging bull in its tracks by switching on an electrode.
Advertising and marketing surely have much to answer for, but for
any serious study of mind control techniques to omit to include any
reference to the behaviourists momentous potential for future
societies seems very poor research indeed. There is not even a
mention of Norbert Wiener, the author of “Cybernetics”,[33]
the originator of the theory of the communications and control of
regulatory feedback whose book, published in 1948, paved the way for
the systems of control which have now been largely set in place to
establish the linking of minds to the super-computers.
There is so often, perhaps in an effort
not to expose something nasty in the woodshed, a flight from the
present into projections into the future, and the implied thrill of
awful things to come. Baroness Susan Greenfield is also of the
opinion, or so it seems, that no matter what things are dreamt up
and put into practice, no-one will be able to take away that private
place in the mind “that no-one else can hack into”.[34]
There is so often, perhaps in an effort
not to expose something nasty in the woodshed, a flight from the
present into projections into the future, and the implied thrill of
awful things to come. Baroness Susan Greenfield is also of the
opinion, or so it seems, that no matter what things are dreamt up
and put into practice, no-one will be able to take away that private
place in the mind “that no-one else can hack into”.[35]
In her book “Tomorrow’s People,” Susan Greenfield is also concerned,
writes Dr Taylor, (p.235) “the further speculations of mass media
technologies into the realm of sophisticated virtual reality could
create increasingly infantilized stimulus-driven, and asocial
consumers whose every need is anticipated and provided by endless
watchful information technologies.” How right she surely is. How
odd, however, that having these concerns, there is no effort from
either Dr Taylor or Baroness Greenfield to assess the history which
brought about this virtual world, and the flight from reality which
feeds on itself, in a never-ending market-driven drive to feed the
infantilised hunger for new diversions.
This year has seen a very large amount of
money donated by the John Templeton Foundation for the establishment
of the “virtually located”
Centre for the Science of
the Mind in Oxford, for the study
of consciousness. It was to be, Susan Greenfield, the new director,
told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme on
12 January, 2005,
“a
getting together of philosophers, neuroscientists and clinicians,
functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI, and that sort of
thing”. They would be inviting people to volunteer for experiments
in ‘raw consciousness’, notably in
the form of pain, was to be induced by putting hot pepper on the
back of a hand to see what effects could be observed in the
subject’s brain through MRI scanning, while they asked the subject
what they were thinking as they experienced this inconvenience.
Since there has not been any response from Oxford,[36]
nor indeed from any other British university[37],
to the appeals from persecuted people suffering unbearable pain from
experimentation for one form of research or another, this really did
seem to indicate that there is something very wrong in academia.
One would have hoped, that the alarms that
were surely given by the behaviourists, and which took hold from the
middle of the twentieth century, dragging Freud through the gutter,
might have stimulated some form of condemnation of the control
systems which have been put stealthily in western democratic
governments. The power of prediction, a source of recent mining and
harvesting by the
researchers of our times for the
reinforcement of control, is assessed in terms not so much as a
refinement of the senses, as a tool which can aid our predictability
studies.[38]
Must everything extraordinary be put to some test, or justified by
its usefulness? If we now understand that being on someone’s ‘wave
length’ is determinable by the mysterious coincidence of sharing
similar resonances, will there be someone waiting somewhere with
government funding to move in the surveillance systems, the remote
scanners, the dipole magnets and the feedback tubes – to swallow it
all down, regurgitate it, pass it off as their own and market it? Is
there no capacity whatsoever in the age of Transhumanism to
analyse one’s envy, and understand acting out as a denial of inner
emptiness?
LASER TECHNOLOGY
The factor of time and the meeting of
waves and the calculation thereof: Dr William Tiller –
Receiving/transmitting antennae.
“All that is necessary for reception of
radiation is a source of Electro-magnetic energy and a wave guide
whose dimensions are first smaller, and then finally larger than a
half-period of the travelling wave.”
The new class of lasers are ‘tunable’,
that is, they can operate at almost any wavelength of the invisible
light spectrum. These devices are used mostly in two’s as optical
transistors, allowing one circuit to control another.
Acoustical holography is an out growth of
optical holography. The wave nature of both light and sound make
holography possible. Acoustical holography involves the
reconstruction of the sound field that arises due to radiation of
sound at a boundary, such as a vibrating body of a violin, the
fuselage of an aircraft, or the surface of a submarine. Both
acoustic holography and optical holography rely on the acquisition
of an interferogram, a two-dimensional recording at a single
frequency of the phase and amplitude of an acoustic or
electromagnetic field, usually in a ‘plane’. Gabor (1948) called
this interferogram a hologram.
The SONY[39]
Patent 0040267118 is a method for generating sensory
experiences. More particularly, the present invention relates to a
method and system for generating a sensory experience using an
acoustic signal directed to a human neural cortex. (December 30,
2004).
One embodiment of the system comprises a
primary transducer array and a secondary transducer array. The
primary transducer array acts as a coherent or nearly-coherent
signal source.
The secondary transducer acts “a
controllable acoustic diffraction pattern that shapes, focuses and
modulates energy from the primary transducer onto the neural cortex
in a desired pattern. The secondary transducer emits an acoustic
energy that may be shifted in phase and
amplitude relative to the primary array
emissions. Changes in the neural firing time by ultrasonic signal
pulsed at low frequencies – changes in timing induced sensory
experiences depending on altered firing time and location of neurons
in the cortex.
The present invention foregoes the
drawbacks of surgical implants by providing a non-invasive system
and process for generating/projecting sensory data (visual, audio,
taste, smell or touch) within/onto the human neural cortex. Moreover
the present invention provides a non-invasive system and process
that uses acoustic signals to generate sensory data, e.g., visual,
audio, taste, smell or touch, within/onto the human neural cortex.
…. Researchers have successfully mapped
audio sensory data to the cochlear channel, and visual data to the
visual cortex…. (See Sony patent)
Synchrotron Radiation-based
instrumentation[40]
[41]
“One of the most exciting challenges to
synchrotron-radiation-based-instrumentation is to develop
experimental techniques to produce and exploit ultra-short pulses (a
few femtoseconds (fs) of electrons or EUV and X-ray-light. It is
already evident that a new community of synchrotron radiation users
is emerging wishing to address new science cases related to
ultra-fast physics, femto-chemistry and new biological
applications.”
The illustration below shows the
synchrotron radiation emerging from a beam port.
Diamond Synchrotron Light Source CCLRC
Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory/ South Oxfordshire
The Diamond light source, opened in
January 2003, at the Diamond Research Centre is to provide cutting
edge research facilities for scientists in the
UK in matters as diverse as from
studying materials in aircraft wings to the development of new
medicines. It can produce ultra-fine ultraviolet and x-ray beams
of exceptional brightness which can penetrate or interact with a
material to reveal views of its microscopic structure.[42]
The light beams directed on to experimental samples must remain
stable to within the width of a human hair. The Diamond Synchrotron
light will use RF electric fields to accelerate electrons to almost
the speed of light (3 GeV). Injected into a circular storage ring
560m in circumference, the electrons will circulate for many hours,
guided by powerful steering and focusing magnets.
While under the influence of magnetic
perturbation, the electrons release energy in the form of
synchrotron light which spans the electromagnetic spectrum from
infrared to hard x-rays (very short wave-length). Synchrotron
radiation is intensely bright and highly focused and may be used to
probe deep inside the structure of almost any material to atomic
level.
LEGAL REGULATIONS ON USE OF LASERS
The Health and Safety Commission and the Health and Safety Executive
and the publication of the 1999 Ionising Radiations Regulations and
Code of Practice provides for 'The protection of persons against
ionising radiation arising from any work activity'.
The Health Protection Agency states that
there are no specific regulations on the use of lasers in the United
Kingdom.[43]
The general safety legislation will apply, such as the Health and
Safety at Work Acts. “A suitable and sufficient assessment of the
risks from the use of the laser should be made by the employer.”
Although there are well
organised procedures to protect and screen personnel for
radioactivity at the Health Protection Agency at Chilton,
Oxfordshire, there are considerable obstacles for screening of the
public. The Medical Officer declined to grant a screening to a woman
who had suffered sudden assaults from an unknown force, and was
concerned that she might be a victim of powerful laser technology in
the x-ray and ultra-violet range of the spectrum. She had
eliminated other causes of losing consciousness under the force of
what she felt were definitely outside forces, and had produced a
doctor’s letter of referral. When questioning the same medical
officer about the possible use of particle accelerators of such
enormous power being used on humans as experimental chambers, the
Medical Officer was asked if she
would feel in principle, as
a doctor, that the use of private citizens as exploratory testing
chambers for scientific research would be a matter for serious
concern. She said she would prefer not to answer that question.[44]
[45]
End of Part 1
[2] See
Two-cavity Klystron later in this paper.
[3] The
writer has a long record of correspondence with a gentleman
in his eighties who contacted her after reading her paper On
the Need for New Criteria…(2003)
and who was first made aware
that he was being irradiated in some form in 1971 when he
was
employed by a large aerospace company in the United States.
He held many positions in the airframe and missiles and
space divisions.
[4] The
writer’s own MP derided the idea of any form of remote
influencing of the nervous system, but when asked if she
thought that sufficient evidence had been presented to her
to raise a question in parliament about their deployment,
she said she’d be ridiculed.
[5] The
Conservative Party leadership candidate, Mr David Davis,
made it known a few years ago that he stood in favour of a
return to capital punishment ‘in
extreme cases and with total evidence’.
[6] Prince
Charles has said he refuses to shake the hand of a man who
has carried out experiments on animals. Professor Colin
Blakemore was not invited to the opening of a centre for
research into schizophrenia near Oxford, and he is the first
Director of the Medical Research Council not to have a
knighthood conferred. Bravo to Prince Charles for such
integrity! Perhaps he shakes hands, unwittingly of course,
with those who practise entrapment and torture of humans,
for those with access to such research are to be found in
high places. Instead of railing against ‘sick building’
syndrome, he would be better advised to look into radiation
sickness imposed by the proliferation of cell masts in
preparation for the wide-scale inflencing of society by the
feedback of the negative vortex. (See: Resonating to a Tin
Plate in the Sky – later section.)
Dr Gerald Hyland’s report to the European Parliament about
the biological effects of repetitive, pulsed frequencies
interacting with ’live creatures’ from GSM and Tetra masts
et al, would also be informative about the worsening
national health. This report has been largely ignored by
the British government. It begins to become clear why it
has been ignored when the application for control methods on
a wide-scale are assessed.
[7] See
“Hacking the Brain”: Philosophy Now, August/September 2005
[8] “Tag
and track” for criminals has been announced by the
Australian government for criminals, (Sydney Morning Herald,
9th September, 2005) following the lead taken by
Great Britain; also control orders permitting police and
intelligence services to electronically monitor a person’s
movements and conversations, and bar them from travelling or
meeting with political or religious colleagues. (World
Socialist Web Site 10th September, 2005)
[9] One is
vividly reminded of the dumb actress in “Singing in the
Rain” miming in the first sound musical while Debbie
Reynolds provides the singing from behind the screen.
[10] The
visual cortex can be scanned by the photo-electric effect,
using synchrotron radiation via absorption of light quanta
(photons) and uploaded to an artificial copy and used for
the sharing of one person’s sight, and extended to others in
real time.
http://www.bessy.de/cms.php?idcatart=434
[12]
US patent 6,754,472: Method and apparatus for
transmitting power and data through the human body.
[13]
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatry:
http://www.musc.edu/tmsmirror/intro/layintro.html
[14]
World’s first brain prosthesis revealed: New Scientist 12
March 2003.
[15]
Ref: “The golden thread that
runs through our history”, the Chancellor, Mr Gordon Brown,
Guardian, 8 July 2005:
"The
two ideologies that have characterised the histories of
other countries have never taken root here. On the one hand,
an ideology of state power, which choked individual freedom
and made the individual a slave to some arbitrarily defined
collective interest, has found little or no favour in
Britain. On the other hand, an ideology of crude
individualism, which leaves the individual isolated,
stranded, on his own, detached from society around him, has
no resonance for a Britain that has a strong sense of fair
play and an even stronger sense of duty and a rich tradition
of voluntary organisations, local democracy and civic life."
Neither has Mr Brown acknowledged letters from British
civilians appealing for an inquiry into their use as
experimentees for research.
[16] Ref:
Roke Manor: http://www.roke.co.uk/defence/stealth.asp
[17] M.
Goasguen, a member of the French Assembly, made a written
request for an inquiry to the Minister of State for
Research on behalf of one of his constituents who complained
of electronic criminality.
[18]
74LVC1GX04 device highlight: Integrated Crystal Oscillator
in Tiny Packages/ One chip crystal oscillator driver/Philips
Semiconductors
http://www.standardics.philips.com/products/lvc/74lvc1gx04/
[19] The
MEP for the South-West has recently responded to many
letters from constituents regarding the cruel practice in
China of trapping bears for their bile, and as a result of
the China Bear Rescue, Mr Glyn Thomas has had a lengthy
meeting with Chinese representatives concerning this
abhorrent activity.
He will shortly press release
the results from the meeting, and will hold a meeting in
Brussels to call for an end to bear farming by the 2008
Beijing Olympics. This is good news. It would be good to
hear that there was any effort to respond to the call by the
European Parliament in January 1999
“ for an
international convention introducing a global ban on all
development
and deployment
of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of
human beings.” this ban can not be implemented without the
global pressure of the informed general public on the
governments. Our major objective is to get across to the
general public the real threat which these weapons
represent for human rights and democracy and to apply
pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world
to enact legislature which would prohibit the use of these
devices to both government and private organisations as well
as individuals.” (Plenary sessions/Euro parliament,
1999)
[20]
“Atomic Mind” written in August, 2005, was an attempt to
trace these similarities, and to reflect on the use of the
human as a model for solving and researching many problems
in physics, not just in plasma physics, but also in
astrophysics.
20.New Scientist: World’s
first brain prosthesis revealed: Hippocampus replacement
12 March 2003
www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3488 - 45k
New Scientist : Brain
prosthesis passes live tissue test.
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6574
[22] And
violent assaults on memory by directed energy as a means of
intimidation and defence against disclosure which threatens
the establishment.
[23]
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/grp/kly/kly_background/kly_background2.html
[24]
Prince Charles launches attack on sick buildings in modern
city living. Evening Standard, 21st February,
2005
[25] Dr
Gerald Hyland’s report to the European Parliament about the
biological effects of repetitive, pulsed frequencies
interacting with ’live creatures’ from GSM and Tetra masts
et al, would also be informative about the worsening
national health.
[26]
http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14183/css/14183_91.htm
[29]
"Physical
Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society"
Jose M. R. Delgado, M.D. (Harper & Row, NY, 1969)
[30] Cross
Currents: The Perils of Electropollution. Robert O. Becker
N.Y. 1990
[31]
Ref .Dr Stuart Mackay, Telemetry
is Coming of Age, 1983
Also an earlier book:
Bio-Medical Telemetry, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York, 1970. The first
edition was published in 1968
[32]
Brainwashing: The Science of
Thought Control”. 2004 (Oxford University Press) ISBN
0192804960)
[33]
“Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and
machine.” Dr Norbert Wiener, 1948.
[34]
Lecture delivered on the subject of the brain to the British
Association of Psychotherapists, 13 May 2005, in the series:
The Human Psyche in a Changing World.
[36] The
Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience,
Professor Colin Blakemore, now the Chief Executive of the
Medical Research Council wrote to the author in 2003 saying
that he “... knows of no technology (not even in the
wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for scanning and
collecting ‘neuronal data’ at a distance.” (Blakemore,
2003,)
[37]
Most letters of protest receive no answer at
all. Professor Basil Hiley, Theoretical physicist, Birkbeck
College, London, took the trouble to reply, but is of the
opinion that the writer is over-emphasising the problems of
accessing the brain by technological means using
microtechnology for distance penetration and mental rape,
and that “we are still very far from understanding how the
mind functions at a physical level. We have no idea how such
distance penetration will work, even in principle. Yes we
can speculate about all sorts of Machiavellian tricks that
may be possible but that is all they are at present just
that speculations.” He feels that one has ‘more grounds to
worry about mass thought manipulation as groups of people go
around massacring their fellow creatures,’ as evidenced in
history from World War I to 9/11.
[38] It is
already likely that a device, gained from enforced
brain-scanning, will soon be unleashed upon us, and which
will be the means of accessing thoughts of a subject before
they have reached the conscious mind. This will be the
ultimate obscenity of research, and the end of the freedom
to determine one’s own thoughts. It is the culmination of
Delgado’s goal: the electrical control of the brain, and the
denial of man to develop his own mind. It is the writer’s
opinion that the vast bulk of research of biotechnology and
neurotechnology has resulted from decades of covert brain
scanning and experiments on the nervous systems of
non-consenting targets. This goes towards explaining the
refusal to open a public debate, and the sustained efforts
to discredit and to silence, by one means or another, those
who accuse the government and research establishments of
practising it.
[39] US
Patent & Trademark Office/20040267118
[40] See
Bessy: www.bessy.de/
[41]
http://www.answers.com/topic/synchrotron-light
[42]
Extremely useful for exploring the brain cells.
[43]
Health Protection Agency: http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/faq/laser/laser8.htm
[44]
Telephone conversation with Chief medical officer of Health
Protection Agency with writer 1st September, 2005
[45] The
simple mention of the unregulated potential of extremely
high-powered lasers to the general medical profession has
occasioned similar alarmed and alarming responses. Laser
technology is taking over the lead from transmission of
voices as a stimulus for the martialling of the white coat
forces. To confess to a belief in satanic practices might
occasion less alarm. One wonders if the next edition of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) will require further
updating in its criteria for sectioning at the mention of
concern about the
unregulated
use of lasers.
|