|
Chapter 2
Diana Cover-Up Turns
Deadly
Jeffrey Steinberg writes in Executive Intelligence Review

Nearly three years after
the Paris car crash that claimed the lives of Princess Diana and Dodi
Fayed, the cover-up of that tragedy has taken a deadly turn, prompting
some experts to recall the pileup of corpses that followed the
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Over the course of four years,
after President Kennedy was shot on Nov. 22, 1963, at least 37
eyewitnesses and other sources of evidence about the crime, including one
member of the infamous Warren Commission, which oversaw the cover-up, died
under mysterious circumstances.
On May 5, 2000, police in the south of France found a badly burned body
inside the wreckage of a car, deep in the woods near Nantes. The body was
so charred that it took police nearly a month before DNA tests confirmed
that the dead man was Jean-Paul "James" Andanson, a 54-year-old
millionaire photographer, who was among the paparazzi stalking Princess
Diana and Dodi Fayed during the week before their deaths.
From the day of the fatal crash in the Place de l'Alma tunnel, that killed
Diana, Dodi, and driver Henri Paul, and severely injured bodyguard Trevor
Rees-Jones, Andanson had been at the center of the controversy.
Mohamed Al-Fayed, the father of Dodi Fayed, and the owner of Harrods
Department Store in London and the Paris Ritz Hotel, has labelled the Aug.
31, 1997 crash a murder, ordered by the British royal family, and most
likely executed through agents and assets of the British secret
intelligence service MI6--with collusion from French officials, whose
cooperation in the cover-up would have been essential.
At least seven eyewitnesses to the crash said that they saw a white Fiat
Uno and a motorcycle speed out of the tunnel, seconds after the crash.
Forensic tests have confirmed that a white Fiat Uno collided with the
Mercedes carrying Diana and Dodi, and that this collision was a
significant factor in the crash. Several eyewitnesses told police that
they saw a powerful flash of light just seconds before the Mercedes
swerved out of control and crashed into the 13th pillar of the
Alma
tunnel. That bright light--either a camera flash or a far more powerful
flash of a laser weapon--was probably fired by the passenger on the back
of the speeding motorcycle. Both the motorcycle and the white Fiat fled
the crash scene, and police claim they have been unable to locate either
vehicle, or identify the drivers or the passengers.
ANDANSON'S WHITE FIAT
Andanson had been in and around Sardinia during the last week of August
1997, as Diana and Dodi vacationed in the Mediterranean. He joined several
dozen other paparazzi, who were stalking the couple's every move. He was
back in France on Aug. 30, the day that Diana and Dodi flew to
Paris.
And that is where the facts about Andanson's activities and whereabouts
get very fuzzy.
For reasons that he never revealed, sometime before dawn on
Aug. 31, 1997, less than six hours after the crash in the
Alma tunnel, Andanson
boarded a flight at
Orly
Airport near Paris, bound
for Corsica. Andanson claimed that he was not in Paris earlier in the
evening, when the crash occurred, but he never produced any evidence, save
a receipt for the purchase of gasoline elsewhere in France (which he could
have doctored or obtained from another person), to prove he was not in the
city.
His son James and his daughter Kimberly told police that they thought
their father was grape-harvesting in the Bordeaux region. Andanson's wife
Elizabeth claimed that she had been at home with her husband all night, at
their country home, Le Manoir de la Bergerie, in Cher, until he abruptly
left for Orly, at 3:45 a.m., to catch the crack-of-dawn flight to Corsica.
Pressed on her version of the story, Mrs. Anderson later admitted to
reporters and police that her husband was constantly on the run, and she
could have been mistaken about the night in question. She told {The
Express}, a British newspaper, "It was always very difficult to recall
James's precise movements because he was always coming and going. The
family was very used to that and so never paid a great deal of attention
to the times he came and went."
What makes Andanson's precise itinerary the night of the fatal crash so
vital is this: He owned and drove a white Fiat Uno. The car was repainted
shortly after the Aug. 31, 1997 Alma tunnel crash, and was sold by
Andanson in October 1997. And, although the official report of the French
authorities investigating the crash concluded that Andanson's car was not
involved in the crash, French forensic reports made available to {The
Express} told a very different story.
One report in the files of Judge Herve Stephan, the chief investigating
magistrate in the Diana-Dodi crash probe, described the tests on
Andanson's Fiat: "The comparative analysis of the infrared spectra
characterizing the vehicle's original paint, reference Bianco 210, and the
trace on the side-view mirror of the Mercedes shows that their absorption
bands are identical." In laymen's terms, the paint scratches from the Fiat
found on the side-view mirror of the Mercedes were identical to the paint
samples taken from the matching spot on Andanson's Fiat.
The report continued: "The comparative analysis between the infrared
spectra characterizing the black polymer taken from the vehicle's fender,
and the trace taken from the door of the Mercedes, show that their
absorption bands are identical."
In short, despite the French investigators' endorsement of Andanson's
alibi, the forensic tests strongly suggested that his car may have been
{the} white Fiat Uno involved in the fatal crash.
John Macnamara, the Harrods director of security, and a retired senior
Scotland Yard supervisor of investigations, told reporters: "Mr. Andanson
had for some time been a prime suspect who had relentlessly pursued Diana
and Dodi prior to their arrival in Paris. We have always believed that
Andanson was at the scene and that more investigation should have been
done into his possible involvement."
Macnamara added, "We believe that his death is no coincidence and that
this is a line of inquiry which may help to discover the truth. Was Mr.
Andanson killed because of what he knew? That is a question we want
answered."
THE “SUICIDE” SOAP OPERA
Needless to say, Andanson's death stirred up renewed interest in Diana's
death at a most inopportune time for the British royals, and those in
France who abetted the cover-up. Sometime in September, an appellate court
in Paris will rule on Al-Fayed's motion to order Judge Stephan to reopen
the crash probe, based on the fact that Stephan shut down his probe before
certain vital avenues of inquiry were fully explored, and in contradiction
to his own interim report, which cited several glaring paradoxes in the
evidence that remained unresolved at the point that he abruptly closed
down his investigation last year and blamed the crash on driver Henri
Paul.
For example, U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security
Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Defense Intelligence
Agency, have all acknowledged, in response to Freedom of Information Act
queries, that they have thousands of pages of documents on Princess Diana.
Those documents, for the most part, remain under lock and key. In addition
to those documents and other relevant evidence, it has been recently
exposed that a secret U.S.-U.K. joint surveillance program, code-named
"Project Echelon," had apparently been involved in round-the-clock
monitoring of Princess Diana's telephone conversations, while she was at
home in England and travelling around
the globe.
Until the contents of these U.S. government files and electronic
intercepts have been reviewed by French investigators, Al-Fayed's lawyers
have argued, the probe cannot be considered complete. And the U.S. Justice
Department continues to stonewall on indicting three Americans who were
involved in an attempted $20 million extortion of Al-Fayed in April 1998,
centered around purported "CIA documents" proving that British
intelligence assassinated Diana and Dodi. While the "CIA documents["]
seized from one of the plotters have been confirmed to have been clever
forgeries, questions remain about the accuracy of the content of the
documents.
In a flagrant effort to dampen interest in the Andanson factor, the June
11 {Mail on Sunday}, a pro-royalist tabloid, ran a story proclaiming
"Wife's Affair Led to Paparazzi Man's Car Blaze Suicide." The {Mail on
Sunday} dutifully peddled the French government's cover story: "The
millionaire photographer who trailed Diana, Princess of Wales in St.
Tropez just days before her death, committed suicide when he discovered
his wife was cheating on him, French police have revealed.... The
eccentric millionaire--who was hailed by colleagues as one of the
godfathers of paparazzi photography, and who flew a Union Flag over his
house to show his love of Britain--was facing a family crisis at the time
of his death."
{Mail on Sunday} reporter Ian Sparks quoted an unnamed colleague of
Andanson's at the Sipa Agency in Paris, making the preposterously
contradictory claim that Andanson "was desperate to save his marriage. We
would never have guessed he would do something so terrible."
He committed suicide to save his marriage!
Right.
A French police spokesman told Sparks, "He took his own life by dousing
himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it."
Andanson's widow Elizabeth, and their son James have rejected the idea
that Andanson's death was suicide. Sources close to the family told {EIR}
that they have pressed French officials to conduct a murder investigation
into Andanson's death 400-miles from his home. The sources dismiss the
bogus "marital problems" story and additionally report that Andanson was
in high spirits over his new job with the Sipa Agency.
THE PLOT THICKENS
Just after midnight
on June 16, just one week after Andanson's death was first made public,
three masked men armed with handguns, broke into the Sipa office in Paris,
shooting a security guard in the foot. The three assailants dismantled all
of the security cameras in the office, and proceeded to enter several
specific offices, clearly aware of exactly what they were looking for.
They made off with several cameras, laptop computers, and computer hard
drives.
Sipa's office employs more than 200 people, and operates 24-hours a day.
The three invaders spent three hours in the office, holding other
employees hostage. According to one of the hostages, the men were never
concerned about the French police arriving at the scene. This hostage was
convinced that the three "burglars" were themselves working for some
branch of the French Secret Service. Furthermore, the source confirmed
that Andanson had worked for French and, undoubtedly, British security
agencies.
The owner of Sipa, Sipa Hioglou, has worked closely with French
intelligence, and, not surprisingly, has been one of the primary sources
of the "marital problems/suicide" cover story about Andanson's death,
"confessing" to French police and reporters that Andanson had confided in
him that he planned to take his own life. Hioglou, in the days following
the bizarre break-in and hostage siege of his office, also told police
that he suspected that the raid was done on behalf of a disgruntled
celebrity who was angry that her picture had been taken by a Sipa
paparazzo without her permission.
In stark contrast, other Sipa employees have told the police that the idea
that Andanson committed suicide was preposterous, and that they suspect
that the break-in was related to his death.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
The Sipa raid, the obvious work of French Secret Service assets, raises
some very troubling questions. If Macnamara and Al-Fayed are right, and
Andanson was at the crash site on Aug. 31, 1997, and his white Fiat was
the car that collided with the Mercedes, what documentation exists of his
presence at the tunnel? What photographs exist of the crash scene, and
what do they reveal? Was some of this material seized from the Sipa
offices in the recent break-in, to assure that it never sees the light of
day?
Evidence has recently come to light, that within hours of the crash,
British and French secret service agencies carried out a series of similar
break-ins at the homes and offices of several photo-agency personnel, in a
desperate search [for] photos of the crash site that may have been
transmitted in the hours immediately after the Alma tunnel collision, and
before word of Princess Diana's death was made public.
(EIR} has obtained copies of sworn statements from two London-based
photographers, Darryn Paul Lyons and Lionel Cherruault, which reveal that
British intelligence was hyperactive in the hours immediately after the
Alma tunnel crash, desperately seeking any revealing photographs that
might have been spirited out of Paris.
Lyons identified himself as the "Chairman of `Big Pictures,' ...
an international photographic agency in
London, New York, and
Sydney, specializing in obtaining and selling unique and exclusive
celebrity-based photographs." At 12:30 a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997, Lyons
received a phone call from a Paris paparazzo, Lorent Sola, who said that
he had a dozen photographs of the accident at the Alma tunnel. Sola
offered to electronically transmit the photos to Lyons immediately, and
Lyons rushed off to his office, receiving the high-resolution photographs
at approximately 3 a.m. Lyons immediately began negotiating with several
large news organizations in the United States and Britain to sell the
pictures for $250,000.
Lyons and Sola conferred after word of Diana's death was made public, and
they decided to withdraw the offer of the pictures. Copies of the photos
were placed in
Lyons' office safe.
Sometime between
11 p.m. on Aug. 31 and 12:30 a.m. on Sept. 1, the electricity at Lyons'
office was mysteriously cut, although no other power outages in the office
building or the neighborhood occurred.
Lyons,
convinced that either the office was being robbed, or bombed, called the
police. In his sworn statement, Lyons declared that he believed that
secret service agents had broken into his office and either searched the
premises or planted surveillance and listening devices.
Lionel Cherruault, a photo London-based journalist for Sipa Agency, in his
sworn statement, reported that, at 1:45 a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997, he received
a call at his home from a freelance photographer in Florida, informing him
that he was expecting to soon be in possession of photographs of the
tunnel crash. Cherruault told the
Florida
contact that he was interested. After word of Diana's death was announced,
the deal fell through.
But Cherruault, who was in contact with his boss at Sipa, stated that, at
approximately 3:30 a.m. on Sept. 1, while he and his wife and daughter
were asleep, his home was broken into, his wife's car was stolen, and his
car was moved. Computer disks used for transmitting photographs, and other
electronic equipment, were stolen, and the front door of their home was
left wide open. Even though cash, credit cards, and jewelry were visible
in the study where the burglars stole the computer equipment, none of
those valuables were taken, making it clear that this was not an ordinary
break-in. The next day, a police officer came to Cherruault's home and
confirmed that the break-in was clearly the work of "Special Branch, MI5,
MI6, call it what you like, this was no ordinary burglary." The officer
said that the home had "been targetted." The man, whose name Cherruault
was unable to recall, assured him "not to worry, your lives were not in
danger," according to the sworn statement.
The official police report of the Cherruault break-in, which has been
reviewed by {EIR}, confirmed that "The computer equipment stolen contained
a huge library of royal photographs and appears to have been the main
target for the perpetrators."
ANOTHER THREAD OF THE COVER-UP
One of the other still-unresolved issues in the Alma crash probe, three
years after the fact, revolves around the medical evidence. Al-Fayed has
been battling in court in Britain for the right to participate in the
official inquest into the death of Princess Diana, arguing that since both
Diana and Dodi died in the crash, therefore he should be entitled to
officially participate in both inquests. The courts have preliminarily
ruled that he has the right to contest the Royal Coroner's rejection of
his participation in the Diana inquest, which will only occur after the
French appellate process has been completed, sometime later this year.
However, in April of this year, the attorneys representing Al-Fayed
received a copy of a suppressed memorandum, prepared by Professors
Dominique Lecomte and Andre Lienhart, two French forensic pathologists
working for Judge Stephan, suggesting that British authorities, including
the Royal Coroner, Dr. Burton, had interceded to conceal some aspects of
the official British autopsy. The two French doctors were in London on
June 23, 1998, where they met with British coroners Drs. Burton and
Burgess, forensic pathologist Dr. Chapman, and Scotland Yard
Superintendant Jeffrey Rees. They were given copies of the English autopsy
report on Princess Diana, but, according to their contemporaneous notes on
the meeting, were told that the document was provided for their "private
and personal use," and that it should not be included in the formal file
of Judge Stephan.
Any material in that official investigative file was automatically made
available to attorneys representing all the interested parties in the
French probe, including Al-Fayed's attorneys.
This two-and-a-half year suppression of the Lecomte-Lienhart memorandum
has once again raised serious questions about the legitimacy of the
"official" autopsy of the Princess of Wales, including questions that
arose at the time of her death, as to whether she was pregnant.
The mayhem surrounding the deaths of Diana and Dodi, and now Andanson,
raises questions about the circumstance in Paris on that night in late
August 1997--questions that the House of Windsor in general, and Prince
Philip in particular, have long sought to suppress. The time may be fast
approaching that the well-orchestrated three-year cover-up is about to
blow apart, and at least part of the truth about the death of the
"People's Princess" see the light of day. And that is something that the
Windsors and the mandarins of MI6 may not be able to survive.
Jeffery Steinberg E.I.R
‘A friend in Paris
travels to work every day through the underpass in which Princess Diana
died. On the day of the incident she noticed all of the security cameras
were turned to the wall and actually mentioned it to her husband. The next
time they were allowed through the tunnel, the cameras were repositioned.’
B. NEWALL,
Rochdale,
Lancs. Letters page, the Daily Mail, February 2000. |